Timeline for "Drupal-X" tags versus "version-x" tags
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2011 at 7:25 | comment | added | Berdir | Agreed. A version-x tag would only get a meaning by using a combination of two tags, for example "views version-3" or "drush version-4". That's imho unecessary complex. Also, I haven't seen the tags drupal-6 or drupal-7 used incorrectly but maybe that is because kiamlaluno already retagged all of them ;) | |
| Mar 26, 2011 at 18:14 | history | edited | avpadernoMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body; edited body
|
| Mar 26, 2011 at 9:05 | comment | added | marcvangend | To me, the second point raised here is the best reason not to use 'version-x' tags. Using a tag means that all questions tagged with it, are related. However Views 3 and Admin Menu 3 are not related in any way so it doesn't make sense to make them share the 'version-3' tag. | |
| Mar 25, 2011 at 16:26 | history | edited | avpadernoMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 1130 characters in body; deleted 22 characters in body
|
| Mar 25, 2011 at 16:21 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by avpadernoMod | ||
| Mar 25, 2011 at 14:55 | history | answered | googletorpMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |