Timeline for Questions about Drupal 8 core development
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://drupal.stackexchange.com/ with https://drupal.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.drupal.stackexchange.com/ with https://drupal.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 13, 2013 at 1:03 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackDrupal/status/290262761143926784 | ||
| Jan 9, 2013 at 21:25 | vote | accept | Chapabu | ||
| Jan 9, 2013 at 15:14 | comment | added | mpdonadio Mod | I'm the lenient mod :) I think @kiamlaluno's edit gives it more focus, and think the question should remain open. I am going to cleanup the comments later today if nobody objects. | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 15:14 | vote | accept | Chapabu | ||
| Jan 9, 2013 at 15:14 | |||||
| Jan 9, 2013 at 13:36 | answer | added | avpadernoMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 13:01 | answer | added | user49 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 12:52 | comment | added | Chapabu | @Letharion Phew, I was worried I'd offended you ;-) I'll leave this question open for a while anyway to let other people (MPD?) weigh in :) | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 12:49 | comment | added | Letharion | @Chapabu, nah, I think it's fine. :) I'm just saying there may be a different question we should also be asking, but then again everyone (except MPD?) seems to be in agreement that the Q should be closed anyway. | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 12:49 | comment | added | Clive Mod | @Letharion I'll give it a little while for more comments on this, but I was literally just about to close it anyway when I saw the link to this discussion. Unless it's improved it doesn't meet the quality standard anyway, from a couple of perspectives, so it will be closed | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 12:47 | comment | added | Clive Mod | @Letharion Always a fun game to play :) | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 12:47 | comment | added | Chapabu | @Letharion I apologise, I probably could have worded my question a bit better - that's what happens when you type with a sandwich in your hand ;-) Please feel free to edit the question if you think it can be worded more efficiently! | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 12:46 | comment | added | Letharion | Yeah, I'm really in favour of closing and suggestion the core queue. I'm mostly playing the devils advocate here, and/or make sure we close the question for the right reasons. | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 12:44 | comment | added | Clive Mod | @Letharion Fair point, but there are at least 2 other applicable close reasons for this question | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 12:44 | answer | added | CliveMod | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 12:43 | comment | added | Letharion | First off, I want to point out that the question itself doesn't really concern core development. The author wants to make a patch, yes, but the question is really about how the routing system works in D8, which can be answered without regard to D8 core development issues. | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 12:43 | answer | added | Chapabu | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 12:38 | history | asked | Chapabu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |