Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I am confirming this, but it is more than likely because some users exercised close votes, and chose a custom off-topic reason. This was the WRONG thing to do with this.

When you encounter spam on the site, the procedure is to

  1. Flag it as spam

The spam flag is special. That is all that is needed.

Please

Just flag it as spam and go on your way.

I am confirming this, but it is more than likely because some users exercised close votes, and chose a custom off-topic reason. This was the WRONG thing to do with this.

When you encounter spam on the site, the procedure is to

  1. Flag it as spam

The spam flag is special. That is all that is needed.

Please

Just flag it as spam and go on your way.

I am confirming this, but it is more than likely because some users exercised close votes, and chose a custom off-topic reason. This was the WRONG thing to do with this.

When you encounter spam on the site, the procedure is to

  1. Flag it as spam

The spam flag is special. That is all that is needed.

Please

Just flag it as spam and go on your way.

replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
Source Link

I am confirming this, but it is more than likely because some users exercised close votes, and chose a custom off-topic reason. This was the WRONG thing to do with this.

When you encounter spam on the site, the procedure is to

  1. Flag it as spam

The spam flag is special. That is all that is needed.

Please

Just flag it as spam and go on your way.

I am confirming this, but it is more than likely because some users exercised close votes, and chose a custom off-topic reason. This was the WRONG thing to do with this.

When you encounter spam on the site, the procedure is to

  1. Flag it as spam

The spam flag is special. That is all that is needed.

Please

Just flag it as spam and go on your way.

I am confirming this, but it is more than likely because some users exercised close votes, and chose a custom off-topic reason. This was the WRONG thing to do with this.

When you encounter spam on the site, the procedure is to

  1. Flag it as spam

The spam flag is special. That is all that is needed.

Please

Just flag it as spam and go on your way.

Added some links.
Source Link
mpdonadio Mod
  • 38.1k
  • 17
  • 32

I am confirming this, but it is more than likely because some users exercised close votes, and chose a custom off-topic reason. This was the WRONG thing to do with this.

When you encounter spam on the site, the procedure is to

  1. Flag it as spam

The spam flag is special. That is all that is needed.

Please DO NOT

Just flag it as spam and go on your way.

I am confirming this, but it is more than likely because some users exercised close votes, and chose a custom off-topic reason. This was the WRONG thing to do with this.

When you encounter spam on the site, the procedure is to

  1. Flag it as spam

The spam flag is special. That is all that is needed.

Please DO NOT

  • Cast a close vote
  • Flag any reason other than spam
  • Edit the spamminess away
  • Edit the links out
  • Also cast an additional downvote.

Just flag it as spam and go on your way.

I am confirming this, but it is more than likely because some users exercised close votes, and chose a custom off-topic reason. This was the WRONG thing to do with this.

When you encounter spam on the site, the procedure is to

  1. Flag it as spam

The spam flag is special. That is all that is needed.

Please

Just flag it as spam and go on your way.

Source Link
mpdonadio Mod
  • 38.1k
  • 17
  • 32
Loading