Timeline for Add Stack Overflow as migration path
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2012 at 23:45 | vote | accept | avpadernoMod | ||
| Jan 26, 2012 at 23:23 | comment | added | avpaderno Mod | @JeffAtwood I imagine that it is also difficult that a question about PHP has not been already asked on SO. I think it is difficult that a question about PHP is not answered on DA, but it is also probable that who asked a PHP question on DA is not asking an awesome question. That is a good point, which also means status-declined. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 23:05 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @kia I am disinclined to send these question to SO, unless they are awesome and are not getting any answers at all here. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 11:33 | comment | added | avpaderno Mod | @googletorp I have already replied about that. If you are saying that is just me to send questions to SO, then it's just you to send questions to SF; neither of those migration paths should be added, then, following your reasoning. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 11:10 | comment | added | googletorp Mod | If you look back 6 months the numbers are very different 2 for both SE and SO. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 10:28 | comment | added | avpaderno Mod | Out of 24 migrations, 12 are for SO, 5 are for Server Fault, 2 for Asku Ubuntu, and 1 for Database Administrators; the rest are for the meta site. SO has the most migrations. I don't get the "get lost in the flood at Stack Overflow"; if they are questions for Stack Overflow, they should migrated there, independently from that (which then would still be true even for migrations done from a moderator). IMO, considering that SO is a related site with such migrations, it makes sense to add the migration path to SO; if it were for EL&U, it would make sense to require X migrations already done. | |
| Jan 22, 2012 at 23:52 | history | answered | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 3.0 |