1

I often see replies that are being marked as answer without a vote-up. As I consider accepted answers as useful, I was wondering whether it would be possible to implement an automatic vote-up when an answer has been accepted.

  • We don't have replies here, we have answers. Let me fix the title for you. – Mołot Feb 5 '14 at 9:08
6

This was discussed on MSO. From the accepted answer:

The latter user has 10 reputation. The right to upvote is earned at 15 reputation.

See https://stackoverflow.com/faq#reputation

Therefore, this proposal doesn't make a lot of sense for the type of users you're talking about.

As this came from Jeff Atwood, it is safe to assume it is a canonical answer.

See also, Accepting answer without upvoting?, which has a Status Declined tag on it.

4

To add to what MPD said, I think that automatic vote-up should not be implemented.

While it makes sense to automatically down-vote spam posts, an automatic up-vote for an accepted answer would be something the OP decides to do. Accepting an answer already gives 15 reputation points to the user who answered; if the user who asked the question thinks the answer deserves extra points, that user can also up-vote it, but accepting an answer doesn't mean the answer is worth an up-vote. If the answer is then that good, it will surely get more than one up-voted, and that automatic up-vote would not give much to the answer.

Considering that the accepted answer is always shown as first answer, independently from its score, I don't see what the automatic vote would take, apart from the extra 10 points the answer would surely get in other ways, if it is really a good answer. The only case where the answer is not show as first answer is when it is written from the user who asked the question.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .