0

Whats an appropriate flag for this type of unconstructive question?

I will love to have in D7 the NavBar Menu whenever I'm on my phone but whenever I'm at my desktop I will love to have Admin Menu. The ability of having both menu is possible ?

Have anyone done this before ?

I flagged it as low quality -- I could see it as Closable too. I'm also asumming English is not the authors 1st language. Usually trying to engage the author rarely results in a better question...

Thanks!

| |
1

I personally don't think this deserves a VLQ flag.

It could possibly be closed for more info to specify which admin menu (toolbar vs admin_menu), or even just a comment asking for more info.

It could also be edited into a better question w/o changing the meaning and intent of the question.

Since both of those are valid options and can be done by anyone (with appropriate privileges), a flag isn't needed.

| |
  • I guess i'm of the mindset only the author can re-word this into a better question if he could be more specific. In general answers to both his questions would be yes, and yes. But a general answer doesn't help his current general question. Without the author taking some effort choose an approach to the problem or do some initial research -- I find his initial inquiry shallow. – tenken Sep 3 '14 at 22:44
  • If OP is not specific enough, then action should be close -> too broad, or close -> unclear, not VLQ flag. – Mołot Sep 4 '14 at 12:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .