This answer (the link is for 10k users) puzzles me: I first flagged it as not an answer but then looking at the user profile, I saw that just the website is filled (but without a correct link), so I reflagged it as spam.
How should this be considered?
The answer text is the following one:
aaaaah that is how you do it on a Mac!!!!!
A non-sense post without any link is not spam; it is spam if it contains links that don't have any purpose, if not promoting something.
If a user keep adding the link for a library in any posted answer, saying "This library can help you." on Stack Overflow those answers would be flagged as spam. If a user just writes "Me too!" as answer, that user is not considered spammer. I don't buy the assumption that the user wrote a non-sense comment to let me check his user profile, and follow a spam link. When I see a non-sense post, I just flag it; I don't look at the user profile.
That answer should rather be a comment, but it doesn't make sense as comment too.
