Timeline for When should we improve a suggested edit, rather than reject it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://drupal.stackexchange.com/ with https://drupal.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 3, 2012 at 19:07 | history | edited | avpadernoMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jul 5, 2012 at 12:38 | comment | added | avpaderno Mod | It depends from how much of the edit is correct. If the proposed edit changes 5 parts of the post, and only one change is not correct, I would not reject the proposed edit; I would rather correct the part that is not correct (which means I improve the edit). I would reject a proposed edit that changes a single punctuation mark, when there are other things to change, or a proposed edit done from a user who changes the question's title for the third time in row. | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 9:13 | comment | added | Clive Mod | According to the folks on Meta SO (can't find a reference right now but I've seen this more than once), if any part of an edit is invalid then the whole edit should be rejected as invalid. Since removing the drupal-commerce tag was clearly incorrect (the question specifically mentions Commerce several times), the right thing to do is to reject the whole edit | |
| Jun 5, 2012 at 7:04 | history | edited | avpadernoMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 73 characters in body
|
| Jun 4, 2012 at 20:02 | answer | added | avpadernoMod | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 4, 2012 at 19:57 | history | edited | mpdonadioMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 164 characters in body
|
| Jun 4, 2012 at 19:52 | history | edited | avpadernoMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Jun 4, 2012 at 19:47 | history | asked | mpdonadioMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |