Wondering if we can/should be a bit more restrictive on what/when we edit "On Hold" or "Closed" questions. I just opened up the front page, and 6 of the top 10 questions that boiled up under "active" were all on hold, and had bumped up because they had been edited.
It would be one thing if the edits were to have added to the question in such a way that they were to:
- Improve the question to the point that it could be reopened
- Preserved the original question/intent of the author
However, most of the edits that I'm seeing on these "On Hold" questions have to do with small grammatical changes that don't really seem to improve the question at all.